> 	>    ["/etc/", "etc.txt"] as File
> 	
> 	The above line _IS_ the concise way!
> 
> The above is *another way* to instantiate objects and it's as 
> verbose as "new"
>  
> ["/etc/", "etc.txt"] as File
> new File("/etc/", "etc.txt")


:-D 
Yes, you're quite right!

I should have been much clearer in my expressions.

I wrote:
> > So we have one way, that is:  [...] as File 

I meant: "So we have even one alternative way"...

And with:
> > The above line _IS_ the concise way!

I meant: 
You need always a classname, parens and parameters.
Using two(!) or three(!) additional characters which
assemble an intuitively understandable common language word 
to mark the instanciation operation is sufficient conciseness.

No need to reduce it even more by replacing them with
a one char symbol one has to _learn_ to understand.

That was my point.

KR
Det

(PS: I only prefer the new as method call over keyword).


***********************************************************************

Die Information in dieser email ist vertraulich und ist ausschliesslich 
fuer den/die benannten Adressaten bestimmt. Ein Zugriff auf diese
email durch andere Personen als den/die benannten Adressaten ist
nicht gestattet. Sollten Sie nicht der benannte Adressat sein, loeschen
Sie bitte diese email. 

***********************************************************************

BITMARCK Software GmbH
Paul-Klinger-Strasse 15, 45127 Essen 
 
Amtsgericht Essen HRB 20680
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Frank Krause, Andreas Prenneis


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email